To Lay Off or Not To Lay Off

Today we look at the area of cost cutting related to staff which for most companies is the largest single item in their profit and loss.

There is no doubt that cutting the size of staff has the advantage of reducing wages, salaries and staff benefits i.e. canteen, uniform, etc.  If business as a whole has fallen then laying off staff that would otherwise have nothing to do makes sense.  The recession also provides another advantage in doing layoffs in that the company can choose to get rid of persons who are unproductive.  One should not wait for a recession to deal with unproductive persons but it does provide an opportunity.  In addition a cut in the size of staff may also lead to a reduction in the office space that a company needs and could reduce the cost of rent.  Staff layoffs can provide an opportunity for a company to survive a lean time so that it can be around for the future.

However there are some distinct disadvantages to letting staff go.  Often times in order to save the most money a company will make redundant its most expensive staff.  The disadvantage of this is that these are the most qualified and often most productive people.  When the time comes to rehire persons, suitably qualified experienced people may not be available.  In addition persons may not be willing to work for the company because there is a sense of little job security.

There is a danger of cutting too many staff resulting in the remaining staff being overworked and stressed.  This can lead to demotivation among staff and can result in productivity dropping significantly.  In addition there is an increase in the level of sickness as members get tired and become more susceptible to illness.  A further problem may arise if too many staff are cut as the internal controls may become weakened.  It is much easier for collusion to take place as reconciliations tend to fall in arrears.  Staff become aware of these situations and find it easier to commit fraud especially if they feel overworked and under appreciated.

It is not an easy thing to decide whether or not to lay off staff and it provides a good opportunity to discuss the company’s situation with staff.  The people who do the work daily are often times the people who can best advise you on cost cutting or other alternatives.  Involving staff in the decision will also lead to increased morale as staff feel like important members of the company.

The opinions on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner.
The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent.
To respond to The Gleaner please use the feedback form.

One Response to “To Lay Off or Not To Lay Off”

  1. Michelle Golding says:

    In the Jamaican Industrial Senario companies then to use lay off as a first option, without looking at other factors of production and see where they can expand their market. From personal experience I believe lay off should be the last option because usually the persons lay off have the prerequisite skills, experience, historical knowledge of the companies mode of operations and can help to move the company forward. I believe companies should more and more seek the involvement of every single worker in its operation to develop strategies to keeps it viable in recession times. Becuase during a recession there a numerous opportunies opening up.

    Layoff should not be used to get rid of non performing employees, but instead proper procedures should be establish within organisation to deal with such matters.

Leave a Reply

1 comment so far
admin Posted by: admin July 13, 2010 at 3:39 pm