Bailout Fever

There is an epidemic spreading throughout the land, it began in the United States of America then spread to Europe and eventually throughout the world affecting even small countries like Jamaica. “What is the name of this malady?” you ask, I shall call it Bailout Fever.

It is hard to believe that six months ago no one had even heard of this condition but then something dramatic happened.  Bear Sterns one of the largest investment houses in the USA was about to close its doors and go into bankruptcy.  In stepped the federal government and provided the means for the company to be purchased by JP Morgan at a significant discount.  It was not evident at the time that this was going to lead to the worse pandemic that the world had ever seen.

As panic set into the market and with house prices falling and mortgagees defaulting on their obligations, the Government stepped in again and provided a ‘bailout’ for the two largest mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Then Washington Mutual failed and Wachovia was sold for a bargain and the government went into overdrive.  Congress and the senates had emergency meetings and approved what is now known as the 700 billion dollar bailout plan for financial institutions with no conditions attached.  Not content to stay in one place, the virus jumped overseas to Europe carried perhaps on the wings of the great “Iron Birds”.

Suddenly banks in Scotland, England, Germany, Netherlands and other countries had caught the fever and now required a bailout.  Perhaps the most virulent stream of the disease was found in Iceland where most of the largest banks required a bailout that in total would have been more than 5 times the total GDP of the country which would have effectively bankrupted the country.  Australia, Africa and Asia were affected, nowhere was safe.

The governments of the world thought that they had wiped out this sickness with the bailouts but like the AIDS virus it mutated into several different deadly strains.  Suddenly the automakers were affected with the big 3 in USA asking for a bailout, then VW in Germany and pretty soon all automakers were affected.  Even the great Toyota from Japan announced that it was going to post the first loss in its 71 year history.  And now the latest is the Porn industry making a bid.  What next?

To be fair at least in the US the bailout had conditions of efficiency attached. It was several of these strains that affected Jamaica resulting in bailouts for the tourist, the manufacturing and the agricultural sectors.

It seems most ironic to me that the only one who has not received a bailout is the Tax Payer who instead is the one that has to foot the cost of the ‘Bailouts’ in the first place.

Feedback Question: Should The Government give bailouts with no conditions attached or should companies be required to become efficient to benefit from the concessions?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The opinions on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner.
The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent.
To respond to The Gleaner please use the feedback form.

5 Responses to “Bailout Fever”

  1. Political Blog says:

    I usually don’t leave comments!!! Trust me! But I liked your blog…especially this post!

  2. JD Lusan says:

    Companies should definitely be required to be efficient in order to receive bailouts. There have been situation where companies receiving bailouts are looking for more as they did not manage it right.

    Also, they should be required to show a different corporate structure and plan in order to prove that they have a plan to do things differently than they did before to get themselves in that position.

  3. Charlie says:

    The Keynesian model of economics assumes that the market will determine the demand/supply ratio. This idea was taken to exponential proportion in the Reagan era. The Achilles heel in this model is that market forces can be manipulated, This can happen by cooking the books, placing artificial value on commodities and failure to institute regulatory oversight. Case in point, cautious investors knew that Country Wide would be in trouble when they started to offer loans at 125% of what was an inflated value of a typical property. Sub prime bowrrowers steped in. Canada on the other hand had regulators who insisted that that sub prime loans should only be 5% of total portfolio. When the loans had to be serviced, most people expected continuous growth. The regulators should have steped in. This unregulated growth concept was then transferred to the equity market where Wall Street made exotic packages bundled as securities. The market marched to this tune and despite warning signs nobody listened. This was compounded by the fact that W/Street executives played with the numbers and even Paulson did not know the true value of assets. Naturally we are taking time to know the true value of liabilities.It was Republican philosophy to let the market regulate itself. Since loans cannot be serviced, nobody trust anybody hence back to Keynes. The government is the lender of last resort. The magnitude and scope of the problem makes this even more sobering. There was a worldwide move to Wall Street. So within this scenario governments world-wide become lenders of last resort hence the global buy out now taking shape. But this too will pass

  4. Charlie says:

    In economics the golden rule is “He who has the gold makes the rules” If companies take government money then the government should make at least some of the rules

  5. Steve says:

    Read this article and you will realize that it was not inefficiency that created the financial crisis we face. It was greed and lack of regulation.

    Enjoy …

    http://www.portfolio.com/business-news/2009/03/03/Formula-That-Killed-Wall-Street?page=3#page=1

Leave a Reply

5 comments so far
admin Posted by: admin January 22, 2009 at 10:38 am